Maybe the Fujinon 35mm f/2 would suit your photography just a bit better.Įven though I don’t use it much anymore, I still love the Fujinon 35mm f/2, and would be plenty happy if it were the only lens I owned. Beside, you might prefer it over the 27mm, because you like the focal-length or larger aperture better. The 35mm f/2 is such a good lens that it just seems “wrong” to give it a silver medal instead of gold, but when there are multiple options that are exceptional, things like that happen. I like the 27mm f/2.8 just a little better, but the new one (with the aperture ring) is tough to find at the moment, so if you are impatient, this is an excellent alternative. If you are looking for a standard prime lens that’s not too big or expensive and just captures wonderful pictures, the Fujinon 35mm f/2 is one to strongly consider.
In any event, I would be a little sad parting ways with the Fujinon 35mm f/2, but it wouldn’t really change much for me. Of course, I have many other lenses to choose from, so sometimes I use the opportunity to try something completely different. However, the number one reason why I choose it over the 27mm is because my wife often has the 27mm lens on her camera, so the 35mm-being a close second pick-is what I use on my camera instead. If I want just a little more reach, or if I need a little larger maximum aperture (such as for low-light photography), the 35mm lens is the one to grab. They’re both excellent options, but I only need one. The 27mm lens isn’t necessarily “better” but it is my preference because I like the focal-length just a little more. So these two lenses-27mm f/2.8 and 35mm f/2-are similar and in many ways redundant. (For those wondering, roughly 30mm on a Fujifilm camera, or 45mm on full-frame, is neither telephoto nor wide-angle). The 35mm lens is 52.5mm full-frame-equivalent, which is also in the range of “standard,” but is a little telephoto. Earlier this year I got the new Fujinon 27mm f/2.8, which has a full-frame-equivalent focal-length of 40.5mm-nearly “standard” (as the eyes see), and only barely wide-angle.
If it’s all sunshine and lollipops, why don’t I use this lens much anymore? It has to do with the focal-length. It’s a great example of the Fujinon quality that Fujifilm has become known for, and I would recommend it to anyone.
It’s a solid prime with a very useful focal length. It captures wonderful pictures! There’s not much at all that can be said negatively about it. The 35mm f/2 is a lovely little lens that’s super sharp, has nice bokeh, has a pretty good maximum aperture of f/2, is fast, small and lightweight. I don’t want to rehash what I’ve already stated, but simply tell you why I love this lens (and also why I don’t use it much anymore).
#Fuji 27mm vs 35mm lenses full#
You can read my full review of the Fujinon 35mm f/2 lens here. There’s a lot to love about this lens, but I don’t use it nearly as often as I once did, and it has absolutely nothing to do with image quality. It was what you would typically see attached to my Fujifilm X-T30, or sometimes my Fujifilm X-T1. The Fujinon 35mm f/2 was once my most-used lens. Chair & Pillow – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 35mm f/2 – “ Ilford Delta Push Process“
0 kommentar(er)
